Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Teddy, Teddy, Teddy. Hmmmm

OK, Teddy Kennedy is barely room temp so I guess I should lay off. But I cannot help it. Here's a great piece from Roger Kimball's blog:
Some important lessons from Ted Kennedy

Posted By Roger Kimball On August 26, 2009 @ 4:53 am In Uncategorized | 68 Comments

[See the update at the end of this piece]

I am deeply grateful for the contribution that Ted Kennedy, who died last night, made to my education. Until Kennedy delivered his intemperate tirade against Robert Bork’s nomination to the Supreme Court in the summer of 1987, I hadn’t known that a United States Senator could brazenly lie to his colleagues and the American people and get away with it. I’m not talking about little fibs, or broken promises, or private dissimulations: all that I took as standard operating procedure in a fallen world. No, Ted Kennedy raised — that is to say, he dramatically lowered — the standard by standing up on the floor of the Senate and emitting one lie after the next against one of the finest legal minds America has ever produced. “Robert Bork’s America,” he said

is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit down at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the Federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of democracy.

A breathtaking congeries of falsehoods that, were they not protected by the prerogatives of senatorial privilege, would have taken a conspicuous place in the annals of malicious slander and character assassination. In The Tempting of America, Judge Bork recounts his incredulity at this tissue of malign fabrication. “It had simply never occurred to me that anybody could misrepresent my career and views as Kennedy did.” At the time, he notes, many people thought that Kennedy had blundered by emitting so flagrant, and flagrantly untrue, an attack. They were wrong. His “calculated personal assault, . . . more violent than any against a judicial nominee in our country’s history,” did the job (with a little help from Joe Biden [1] and Arlen Specter[2]). Not only was Kennedy instrumental in preventing a great jurist from taking his place on the Supreme Court, he also contributed immeasurably to the cheapening of American political discourse. The fact that “bork” has entered the language as a transitive verb is, I’ve always thought, a final unfairness. Really, the verb should involve the name “Kennedy.” Less staccato, I admit, but in that scenario, the malfeasance was practiced not by Robert Bork but Edward Kennedy and his cronies.

Indeed, Kennedy was a veritable fount of enlightenment. A waddling argument for the wisdom of term limits, he showed the world how, provided you came from a rich and unscrupulous family, you can get caught cheating [3] on a Spanish test at Harvard and still manage to graduate a few years later.

But of course, Ted Kennedy’s most important lesson for the world involved Mary Jo Kopechne, the secretary he let drown in 1969 when he drove his car off a bridge at Chappaquiddick Island late at night after a party. Kennedy said he endeavored to rescue the girl. Maybe. But what we know he did was contact several aides to work out a story. He waited until after the police discovered the car and Kopechne’s body the next morning before informing the police about the incident. He received a two-month suspended sentence for leaving the scene of an accident after causing an injury. Wikipedia calmly notes that “Questions remained about Kennedy’s time line of events that night, about his actions after the accident, and the quality of the investigation and whether official deference was given to a powerful politician and family.” Do you think, just possibly, that unusual deference was shown to Ted Kennedy?

The Kennedy family has issued a eulogistic statement [4] about the death of the Senior Senator from Massachusetts. Right and proper, I suppose, but I couldn’t help recoiling from its lists: “Edward M. Kennedy — the husband, father, grandfather, brother and uncle we loved so deeply — died late Tuesday night at home in Hyannis Port.”

“Edward M. Kennedy,” I heard echoing behind those words, “Liar, cheat, drunk, philanderer, and — let’s not forget — inadvertent murderer.”

The tsunami of sentimental pap about Kennedy is already churning, gushing, rushing to inundate the public with a nauseating and untruthful fairy tale about the “Lion of the Senate.” The Lyin’ in the Senate is more like it. Kennedy was 77 when he was taken off last night, Mary Jo Kopechne had just turned 29 when Kennedy’s car veered off the bridge in Chappaquiddick and he wriggled free and swam to shore, leaving the young woman trapped in the car to drown.

* * * Update: In response to news of the death of Ted Kennedy, a friend did a little research into the Kennedy’s legislative history [5] and concludes that “There is not one thing he proposed that deals with helping people who actually work for a living, or a business, or promoting capitalism. It is an absolute litany of destructive liberalism. He is the absolute worse.”


Article printed from Roger’s Rules: http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball

URL to article: http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2009/08/26/some-important-lessons-from-ted-kennedy/

URLs in this post:

[1] Joe Biden: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/jonah052401.asp

[2] Arlen Specter: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Arlen-Specter-Im-still-relevant--After-all-I-helped-kill-Bork-50682887.html

[3] get caught cheating: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kennedy

[4] eulogistic statement: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/08/26/statement_from_the_kennedy_family/

[5] legislative history: http://kennedy.senate.gov/issues_and_agenda/


Thursday, August 20, 2009

They Drank the Kool-Aid

Well, it's been a while. Apologies to all my followers! I have not graced you with any scintillating commentary in ages.

Now I'm back so you can exhale.

Today I read an article in the journal about Obama's fizzling attempt at post-partisan politics (something both Clinton and Bush promised, according to the Journal). This was bound to happen and I'm not sure if I can say I told you so (maybe in a previous blog post?). But the larger point is that you really need parisanship, otherwise, we'd all agree and then nothing good would happen... that sounds odd, but that's the way it is. That's the way you get to good policy -- a back and forth.

What is pretty disturbing however is people's allegiance to Obama based on .... nothing. Or nothing beyond his charm, good looks, feel good attitude. Take for instance on NPR yesterday. There was a woman interviewed about how her number is the same or similar to GM's "cash for clunkers" hotline -- the difference was 800 vs. 877, etc. Anyway, at the end of the interview she said something like, "well, I don't mind too much. I know it's tough out there and we have to support the president," etc. Now, I guess we all want to "support the president" in the grand scheme. However, should we support him on something that doesn't make sense? And should we just support him because he's the president?

This is interesting and raises the sticky issues. Of course many people didn't support Bush's Iraq strategy. I never had a problem with people who were against it. But few arguments amounted more than personal attacks on Bush.

The fact is, right now Democrats have suddenly developed some sort of short-term memory problems or just outrigh "confabulatory hypermnesia," or severe false memory syndrome (oh the internet! What would we do without it?!!?). They seem to think that they were all perfectly normal and well behaved when it came to their opposition. Ha! What a joke.

And now worse than complaining about opposition to Obama's healthcare proposals, Democrats and others on the left are calling it racist! Awesome. The Race Card.

This is what we've devolved to. What a revoltin' development.